Friday, November 19, 2010

The Everyday Transformation of Recovery | By Lael Ewy

In Back Of The Real
railroad yard in San Jose
     I wandered desolate
in front of a tank factory
     and sat on a bench
near the switchman's shack.

A flower lay on the hay on
     the asphalt highway
--the dread hay flower
     I thought--It had a
brittle black stem and
     corolla of yellowish dirty
spikes like Jesus' inchlong
     crown, and a soiled
dry center cotton tuft
     like a used shaving brush
that's been lying under
     the garage for a year.

Yellow, yellow flower, and
     flower of industry,
tough spiky ugly flower,
     flower nonetheless,
with the form of the great yellow
     Rose in your brain!
This is the flower of the World.
--Allen Ginsberg

What has me thinking about this poem right now is the delight and terror, the cosmic meaning Ginsberg finds in a homely, even horrid, little object: a foreboding, ugly flower in a forgotten scrap of land, a flower that just about nobody else but the desolate wanderer speaking the lines would happen to find. This poem exemplifies one of the most powerful and compelling traits of creative work: finding deep meaning in the mundane. Art is at its best when it’s heavily laced with the everyday.

This is both an artistic standpoint for me and a coping mechanism. In recovering from a major depressive episode nearly 20 years ago, I found myself drawn to those small moments and images that tied me to the world: a tree blazing orange on a crisp, fall day; the bruised gray-blue of a Kansas thundercloud; the pitch and roll of my old Mustang when she cleared a curve, the V8 pushing me back as we sped away.

If we get entirely too caught up in purity and perfection, we set ourselves up for continual disappointment and eternal frustration. The more “pure” a poem is, the more it trends toward a glossy sort of dullness. We know that Anne-Sophie Mutter has suffered as we have by the rough edge she puts on an otherwise sweet Brahms violin concerto.

An oyster without an irritant will yield no pearl. 

Unless we are able to abide with the small, inglorious steps we need to take to reach our goals, we’re unlikely to even begin, whether that goal is finishing the great American novel or merely getting out of bed in the morning. At my lowest, I made my goal taking a walk every day, rain or shine, snow or ripping prairie wind. Walking, I found gnarled hedge-apple trees and the scent of their decaying fruit. I found the tickle of the night’s cobwebs as their spiders ambitiously blocked my path. I found in the sandpiper’s cry the courage to keep on going.

The power of peer support is to have another who is there with you and has been where you are, reminding you that this glorious, ugly moment leads to another and another, and in those, too, there will be flowers, tough and spiky, resilient and industrious—and ready to be rediscovered in the moment after. I found a supportive peer in Ginsberg. Now, I’m helping others be supporting peers in the flesh.

And recovery, then, is an art, one that takes place moment-to-moment—an art that looks a lot like life.   

Photo courtesy of  Francesco Pappalardo

Friday, October 8, 2010

Social Change, Songwriters and Ipods

On an unbearably hot August night, I recently went to see one of my favorite singer/songwriters, Jackson Browne in concert at an outdoor amphitheater in Kansas City.  One of the best moments of the night, or at least as far as my heat-singed brain could remember, was when he did a song entitled "Looking East" that's a statement of his concerns and hopes about this country as he sees it from his home in California.  The line that always catches me, and one of the reasons I love this song, is "these times are a famine for the soul but for the senses they're a feast."  He goes on with lyrics about the "hunger" underneath our social problems and the power that exists to change things. 

This song, as do many of Jackson Browne's songs, make me think of conversations I've had with a number of organizations regarding how to create social change.  I usually use an example such as this:  Social change comes about because someone, just one person frequently, stands up and points out the issue and offers an option to the way things are currently.  That person, and maybe a few others who have the same revolutionary perspective, offer a vision of how things should be...and some ideas about how to get there.  These people are the innovators.  Think of Steve Jobs (or whomever created the Ipod or Ipad) as a technological innovator.   If the innovators are loud and passionate enough, early adopters jump on.   Those are the people who had an Ipod while the rest of us were still carting around bulky CD players...or cassette Walkmans.  Eventually, when enough of the early adopters join in and start telling others about how great this new thing is, the early majority gets on board.  Those are the people who got an Ipod in about the 3rd generation (while their kids probably had at least a 2nd generation Ipod).   The early majority represents a critical mass or a tipping point where it's more normal to do the new thing than not.  But there are still some who stand back and view the new thing with suspicion or skepticism...at least until they see evidence that the new thing really works...or doesn't cost too much or isn't a fad.  These are the late adopters.  They'd be the people who only recently got an Ipod...or are still mulling over the idea and worrying that something will come along and make the Ipod obsolete.   Finally, there are the laggards.  Really, the laggards are the people who finally give in because they don't have many other options.  They're probably the people who argued with their car dealer about why they have to have a CD player when a cassette player or radio would be just fine. 

This example illustrates the Diffusion of Innovations model by Everett Rogers.  It's one of my favorite models because I think it perfectly illustrates how things actually happen.  We can think of all kinds of examples that are much more relevant than the revolution of the Ipod.  This same process has happened with such major social issues as recycling/environmental consciousness, smoking, civil rights...just to name a few really powerful examples. 

So why did I reference this particular Jackson Browne song in the beginning.  Honestly, I want everyone to go out and buy his music because I like him so much.  But more importantly, his songs always reference the power of the individual to create change.  To quote my good friend Jackson once again "...long ago I heard someone say something about Everyman."   In this song, called "For Everyman," he refers to the power and responsibility of all of us to care for others.  So it's up to individuals to be the voice for change.  Eventually, if you're passionate and have an idea of how to make things better, others join in...and then they bring others...until it's normal to do the healthy, caring thing. 

So these times may be a feast for the senses (thanks in part to the Ipod...or Ipad)...but they don't have to be a famine in so many ways.  It doesn't take a program or even a specific activity.  It just takes one person to start a movement that leads to social change.  And that person can be anyone.  As Jackson says "...power in the song being sung alone" (from "Looking East" again).

Just one last thing:  If anyone has a chance to talk to Jackson Browne, please thank him for being an innovator who inspires others to create change.  And also tell him that regardless of how great he was onstage, it's never, ever a good idea to wear a funky retro polyester shirt in Kansas in August.  I'm just saying... 

Written by Tara Gregory, Research and Evaluation Coordinator & Rock Goddess

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Social Network Evaluation in Analysis

Note: This blog post is a reposting from AEA 365. Check them out for more great tips to guide your evaluation processes.


My name is Oliwier Dziadkowiec and I am a fourth-year doctoral student in Community Psychology at Wichita State University (WSU) in Wichita, Kansas. My colleague, Trish Peaster, and I recently conducted a Social Network Analysis (SNA) through our work at WSU’s Center for Community Support and Research. The client requesting the SNA was a coalition composed of 139 members across 10 counties. We were hired to determine the following:
  1. Network density of coalition members within and between employment sector
  2. Key coalition members within each employment sector
  3. Current and emerging leaders, mentors, and innovators across the network
  4. Opportunities for enhancing the network
While there are a number of popular software packages for SNA including UCINET , Pajek, and Net Miner, we decided to try Network Genie to collect our data and InFlow 3.1 to analyze the data.

Hot Tip: We had a good experience using Network Genie for collecting social network data. It is administered online and is easy for participants to indicate who they know by simply double clicking on their name. Follow-up questions such as “how often do you communicate with this person” and “how many projects have you worked on with this person” are then asked only for those whom the participant knows. This feature makes answering follow-up questions much easier, especially for large networks. Network Genie is not free, but it is easy to learn and has excellent customer support. Alternative data collection methods can be found in Social Network Analysis (Knoke, D. & Yang, S., 2008).


Hot Tip: InFlow is not as easy to learn, but has several nice features. For instance, data collected from Network Genie can be directly downloaded into Inflow for analysis. These are not sold as a package, however. Inflow also has nice graphical features and good documentation of all the commands needed for analysis. The program has an easy to use “point and click” menu, but the range and flexibility of operations that you can perform are fewer than with other SNA software packages.

Hot Tip: Have a good theory. In order to evaluate the network (size, clusters, key players), we found it useful to use the framework developed by Valdis Krebs and June Holley Building Smart Communities through Network Weaving (pdf). This theory allowed us to objectively judge the strength of the network and make recommendations for enhancing it.

Hot Tip: SNA packages have a variety of measures to evaluate networks. Be sure that you understand the meaning of each measure or have a consultant nearby who does. This is key to making your findings valid and meaningful to your client.

Want to learn more from Oliwier and Trish? They will be presenting as part of the Evaluation 2010 Conference Program, November 10-13 in San Antonio, Texas.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Wichita Survey Takers Wanted

Hey ICT people-

One of our researchers – Emily Grant – needs your help! She’s working on her dissertation about the beliefs/attitudes that Wichita residents have about the environment and needs 1000 ICT residents to fill out her survey.

This survey is purely to gather information; there are no right or wrong answers.




So help her out by donating 15 minutes of your time! http://wichita.kumc.edu/care/








Photo courtesy of Sean McGrath

Monday, August 9, 2010

5 Questions About Visioneering Wichita (And how CCSR was involved)



As some of you reading this blog may already know, Visioneering Wichita has been selected to receive the 2010 Alliance for Regional Stewardship (ARS) Organizational Champion Award presented by the American Chamber of Commerce Executives (ACCE). 

What some of you may not know, is that back in 2005, when the Center for Community Support and Research was known as the Self-Help Network, we were helping shape and develop the fledgling initiative. So in honor of our partners over at Visioneering Wichita, and their well-deserved award, we present “5 Questions about Visioneering Wichita”

Q1: What exactly is Visioneering Wichita?

VW is a 20 year strategic plan that started in 2004 designed to improve the quality of life, foster economic development, and promote civic leadership in the city of Wichita. This plan was based on input from over 16,000 Wichita residents.

Q2: What are the goals of Visioneering Wichita?
  • To promote job growth
  • Stop the decline of Wichita per capita income
  • Provide for a skilled workforce
  • Increase the number of post-secondary students by 3% per year
  • Develop the downtown area to promote economic development and to expand the arts/culture of Wichita
  • Promote racial diversity, opportunity and harmony
  • And more. 

Q3: How was CCSR involved in Visioneering Wichita?
CCSR provided a series of leadership development classes for the Visions Partners – promoting civic engagement and community collaboration. As a result of these classes, participants were able to:

  • Better understand the elements of a successful community collaboration
  • Identify strengths and challenges in collaboration
  • Learn how to use their newfound leadership skills within their local organizations, networks and coalitions
  • Develop and action plan for organizing and bringing together groups to assess collaborative strengths and challenges.
  • Grow in ability and willingness to participate in future strategic alliances and other community leadership roles.
Q4: Will Visioneering Wichita really work?
The plan is solid, but we need the support of the Wichita citizens, businesses and government. If we all work together and focus our efforts, we can drastically improve our quality of life and meet the VW benchmarks.

Q5: How do I find out more about Visioneering Wichita?
Good place to start – The Plan.  Available to download as a pdf from Visioneering Wichita.
Or just contact info@visioneeringwichita.org.

Congrats again to Visioneering Wichita in receiving this national award!



Photo Courtesy of AnyJazz65

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Thoughts on Our Nowegian Visitor

Senior researcher Johan Barstad of the Patient Education Research Center in Moere Og Romsdal, Norway, recently visited the Wichita State University Center for Community Support and Research (CCSR) on Thursday and Friday, June 24-25.  Barstad is interested in CCSR due to its 25+ year experience in promoting and researching self-help groups.



Barstad met with CCSR to discuss previous methods of research, methods of assisting self-help groups and how to integrate self-help groups into professional services.  More specifically, Barstad was gaining input on Norway’s national initiative to incorporate self-help groups into health and human services.  Barstad is a part of a research team in Norway who is trying to better understand the diversity of self-help groups in the country and the relation between self-help services and professional services. 

His two days included meetings with CCSR Director Scott Wituk, the CCSR Research & Evaluation Team and the CCSR Mental Health Consumer Initiatives Team.  Additionally, Barstad met with self-help group researchers and experts: Greg Meissen and Lou Medvene from Wichita State University.  Finally, he visited with three Kansas self-help organizations: Project Independence, Good Grief of Kansas and Victory in the Valley.

Scott Wituk commented on the recent visit.  “What Johan and others in Norway are doing is phenomenal.  They are attempting to bring together the very informal, grassroots self-help groups with the professional helping systems to create new forms of sustained, effective, and low-cost care.  They are attempting to create empowered patients who actively participate in their health care.  Self-help groups can play a role in that.  In many ways, the challenges in the U.S. health care system are not too different.  We thoroughly enjoyed the visit and learned a great deal.  I hope to be working with Johan in the future on a few international self-help projects.”   



Photo courtesy of ElBosco

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Spotlight on an Initiative: Compassion Kansas



What is Compassion Kansas?

CCSR is in the last year of its Compassion Kansas initiative, a 3-year, federally funded project designed to enhance Faith-based and Community-based Organizations through grants, workshops and one-on-one capacity building assistance.

Capaci-what now?

Community nonprofits, groups, and coalitions can typically be very effective in targeting the specific needs of their local communities. But these smaller organizations frequently lack the organization needed to thrive.

These organizations are far more successful when they operate with adequate funds, thoughtful planning, a well-trained staff, effective boards, and the ability to respond to challenges.

That’s essentially what capacity-building is – giving organizations the tools to do what they do, better.

Okay, so what capacity-building services does Compassion Kansas offer?


In addition to the financial awards, Compassion Kansas provides:
•    Assistance in developing stronger grant applications
•    Strategic Planning
•    Plans for diversifying funding sources
•    Board development and leadership
•    Staff and volunteer management
•    Networking opportunities
•    Statewide attention to the work of these organizations

These services are provided through workshops, and one-on-one mentoring with a CCSR staff member.

What’s in store for the future of Compassion Kansas?


Compassion is undergoing some changes, but the Center for Community Support & Research is committed to continuing capacity-building efforts across Kansas.

So, dear Kansans in community coalitions, alliances, fledgling nonprofits – what would you like to see in the future as far as capacity building efforts go?